Abstract:
In 2015, the Gauteng Department of Health announced the termination of its contract
with Life Esidimeni, a private healthcare provider which had been outsourced by the
department to provide specialised psychiatric care to state patients. Within months of
this announcement, more than 1500 patients had been transferred to the care of over
100 facilities including non-profit organisations (NPOs) and state-owned psychiatric
hospitals. These facilities had inadequate resources including infrastructure and care
workers, ultimately resulting in the deaths of 144 psychiatric patients. The purpose of
this study was to investigate how government officials managed the Life Esidimeni
crisis from the perspective of crisis communication. Using qualitative textual and
thematic analysis, this study adopted Coombs’ Situational Crisis Communication
Theory (SCCT) and Seegers’ Best Practice Model as frameworks to examine how the
government communicated during the Life Esidimeni crisis. The study adopted a
qualitative research approach and document analysis method for data collection. The
study revealed that during the Life Esidimeni crisis, communication and stakeholders’
active participation were inadequate. Furthermore, the use of combined crisis
communication strategies by government health officials demonstrated a
misunderstanding of the nature of the crisis. The study recommends that organisations
should refine their crisis communication plans based on the recommendations by the
Situational Crisis Communication Theory and Best Practice Model to promote
stakeholder engagement and develop unique crisis communication strategies for
crises in different clusters